3.11.2007

All Fun, All the Time

Where can you find a glass cowboy hat, nudie prints of Marylin Monroe, and more overpriced fake jewelry all in one place west of the Mississippi and south of Mt. Shasta? Why, the Rose Bowl Flea Market, of course.

After many years of living in the Pasadena area, the clan made a trek to the Rose Bowl Flea Market, an extravaganza of used trinkets, castoff curios, aging antiques, a flea market festivus. I wouldn't consider it a serious excursion; more of an initial foray, a reconnaisance mission of ample merit to justify the price of admission. We wandered about for a happy hour and a half, seeing enough to make me realize that bargains are to be had, but take some serious effort on the part of the shopper.

Like every other red-blooded American speculator who has a touch of the fey in him, I've often dreamt about stumbling across a priceless piece of lace, an invaluable image of an overlooked artist, an uncherished china set whose manufacture is sufficiently ancient or expert as to be appraised in the millions, a fact only made known to me in the middle of an episode of Antiques Roadshow. Unlike the other incredulous folks on that show, I wouldn't shed a tear for said item, pledging to preserve it on the lintel or brick it up in an alcove of home. I'd turn around and sell that thing faster than you can say, "Bob's your uncle," invest in a high-yield hedge fund and spend the rest of my life reading books and changing the world as I randomly see fit.

Aaaaanyway, after that somewhat happy insight into my daydreams, back to the Rose Bowl. The flea market is a massive, hot, crowded place that succeeded in making me vastly more respectful of all the souks and bazaars I've wandered through in the Middle East (okay, so they were in Tunisia, and they numbered three or so). By the end of my time at the flea market ("I'm talking 'bout flea market"), I found myself wishing the vendors would show more than an whiff of interest in my arrival. In the medina in Tunis, if you're eyes so much as betrayed an interest in the mass-produced hookahs piled in front of a booth or the glassware handblown by native tribeswomen in the Grand Erg Oriental (no doubt conveyed to Tunis by louage and camel), a salesman/woman will be clinging to you like the black alien suit that's taking over Spiderman this summer (and becomes Venom when it falls on that smarmy actor whose name I can't recall).

To be honest, I think I prefer the happy medium of the Sunday street market in Ljubljana. There, fellows who had aged beside their (now) antique wares peddled relics of the Cold War that once had been staples of their lives. Others sold farm implements that seemed suited for the 16th century, but appeared to still have dirt on them. But, more relevant to this conversation, they were engaged without being overbearing. Most fellows were willing to negotiate a fair amount, share information (true or false wasn't exactly clear), and explain details of the various incredibly complicated mechanical devices that may or may not have once told time, but now looked more suited to permanently detatch infant fingers from baby hands. They weren't completely buddy-buddy, nor did you want them to be, but there was an unspoken rapport. Ah, for the days of my youth and the cobblestone streets of Slovenia's capital.

Regardless, the flea market will undoubtedly be the source of much more gold in weeks (years?) to come.

Islands and the Son



How not to begin an article:
HERE, on an island that might be called Camelot, the winds of democracy have blown in like the waft from a landfill.
  • a) Camelot was no island, unless you want to call it an island of beauty in a world of...hmph, you get the idea.
  • b) Winds don't waft. Scents waft. So, is the air windy or wafty?
  • c) The mixture of images leaves me trying to conceive of an island just offshore off a mainland dump. How silly.
But this is just nitpicking; the rest of the article is quite interesting. In fact, I dare say, fascinating. The island under discussion is Sark, a curious little spot of island planted in the middle of the English Channel. It sounds more than a little delightful:
Algernon Swinburne, the 19th century poet, called it a "small, sweet world of wave-encompassed wonder."

Sark has remained pretty much the same for 442 years, since Queen Elizabeth I declared it a noble fiefdom. Transport is by bicycle, horse-and-carriage or Wellington boots. When absolutely necessary, one may resort to one of the island's few tractors. But the neighbors, never frugal with opinions, tend to look up from their gardens and make case-by-case assessments of what constitutes necessity.
Charming, no? Even more interesting, it's one of the last few places around Europe that still operates on a feudal system.Landownership is divided among 40 "tenants." They are the descendants or successors of the 40 men with muskets recruited by the original seigneur, the ruling lord commissioned to defend the isle against pirates and buccaneers. Government administration is by fiat, with the island administrator, judge, constable and clerk appointed by the current seigneur, a 79-year-old former aeronautical engineer whose family has governed Sark since 1852. Or so it was governed until dips from England decided to move in, and have since protested the sales tithe taken by the seigneur. Anyone who purchases land must pay the seigneur a thirteenth of the sale price. To protest this, and under the guise of being "pro-democracy," the new English idiots have decided to try to upend the antiquated (but functional system) and reduce their tax burden, ignoring the fact that taxes on Sark, all told, are a sliver of what they are on the big island.

I could write no small amount more on this subject, but I'd rather not get steamed (and I do have other work to do). Instead, I'm going to hope that Sark goes democratic when it actually wants to, not when some legalistic invaders decide to appeal to EU regulations to force it upon the island. As anyone who has ever gotten involved in local politics can attest, in a democratic country, it's ridiculous. A benevolent, low-tax, non-welfare state feudal system sounds just about right to me.

3.08.2007

Alma Mater Dear

Why couldn't I have thought of this?

A former USC lecturer who taught in the university's business school pleaded guilty Wednesday to conning his students and their parents out of $1.5 million by promising huge returns on real estate investments in Chicago and Las Vegas.

Barry Landreth, 37, faces up to 20 years in federal prison on a single felony count of wire fraud. He is scheduled to be sentenced June 4.

Landreth, a 2001 graduate of USC, was living in Coto de Caza and working as a part-time lecturer when he was arrested a year ago. He also was running Webster Realty Investors Inc., which billed itself as a diversified real estate investment and development company with projects nationwide, according to authorities.
More to the point, who the hell are these people who bite on this? Apparently Landreth offered a 190% return in 45 days...people, please, give me a break. They deserved to lose their shirts: they were buying into a Ponzi scheme and they knew it. Except, of course, Landreth was, how do I put this, an idiot:
Instead, Landreth deposited $718,000 of their money into his personal bank account, officials said. He used much of the remainder of the funds for personal expenses, prosecutors said, including $500,000 to buy and care for show jumping horses, a $73,000 Cadillac Escalade and $52,000 for brokerage accounts in his and his wife's names.
Lando, my man, you have to at least pay off some of the people. What did you think was going to happen? Why weren't you salting this all away into a bank account in the Bahamas? Aye yi yi, so many questions, so little time before he's imprisoned.

I'm guessing the law enforcement radar's going to be up now for Trojan alums trying to pull a fast one...guess I should lay low.

Watch out...


Be careful where you place your feet...

3.07.2007

Fun with Professor

Prof. U never fails to entertain. Among the things learned today in class...

That, of course, is in addition to the substance of the class, an element of which is illustrated here.

Heavens

I found this strangely inspiring. Like a friend once said, everybody's gotta have a dream.

3.06.2007

Old Onion Rings

I'm not sure how I ended up here, but when I did I couldn't stop laughing. Ah, gotta love it.

SegWay

No, not the latest scooter craze, I'm talking about segregation in schools. Actually, I'm not really talking about it. Aaron Hanscom is: Consider the case of Mount Diablo High School in Concord, California. Mount Diablo's website states that students will "celebrate diversity by being respectful to all walks of life." In keeping with that ethos, last month the school divided students by ethnicity for separate assemblies.

School officials explained that the purpose of segregating the students was to talk about test scores, recognize achievements and celebrate different cultures. Spanish was presumably spoken at the Hispanic assembly because student Ronald Mares said, "When I went to the assembly, I'm Hispanic, but I don't know how to speak Spanish, so I couldn't connect." Freshman Jason Lockett was disappointed with the African-American assembly, at which the words "Black Power" were projected overhead. "It was to compare us and say how much dumber we were than everybody else," Lockett told the Contra Costa Times. Good gravy...this is supposed to be an advance? Political correctness has so turned on itself that it is now advocating segregation?

Actually, you could see this one coming a long way off. I've often noted the practice, on high school and college campuses alike, of self-segregation by minorities. Note: I've noticed it, I'm not saying that it's necessarily right or wrong. But what I always thought more curious was the increasingly splintered campus map: it seemed like school administrators could put another notch on their buckler if they could find another obscure minority to separate into their own little entity. The phenomenon could have been worse; at least at USC we had football to bring us together and they do push the whole notion of the "Trojan Family."

But it wasn't so long ago that the institution of Black Student Unions on campus was seen as controversial because it would be a kind of tacit segregation. Now, we have Asian and Pacific Islander Associations, the Taiwanese Association, the East Asian Cultures Club, the Hawaiian Islanders Student Organization, and so on...the celebration of diversity has been increasingly exclusive. Follow that to the extreme and you realize that it's not so far-fetched to forbid those other kids to attend your heritage assembly.

Speaking of which, why the hell are they having heritage assemblies anyway? And what about those with Latin American heritage who resent the term Latino? What if they want their own unique Nicaraguan heritage celebration? How dare the school district trample on their unique culture by lumping it together with everyone else south of the border?

Actually, to continue with that thought, and this stream of consciousness I've devolved into, just imagine if, instead of a Danish Day or Oktoberfest, your school had a "European Day." What the hell would that mean? And yet no one bats an eye when you celebrate "Latino Heritage Day." Yeah, as if the struggles and histories of all those little nations to the south are identical. What unbelievable condescension. Whoever cooked that up is a jackass. Welp, I'm swearing. Time to hang up now.

Mr. Who?

I got a kick out of this description of a movie that's playing at USC, or at least they're having a screening at USC. It's called Mr. Conservative:

This 90-minute profile of Barry Goldwater details his rise from local Arizona businessman to hugely influential U.S. senator with a 30-year career that crescendoed in an ill-fated 1964 run for president. Mr. Conservative: Goldwater on Goldwater follows that tumultuous year, as well as others in a career that encompassed numerous political and ideological triumphs. Though he never achieved the ultimate prize, Goldwater saw the conservative agenda he had long championed vindicated with the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980.

At the height of his power, Goldwater was the symbol of conservatism, denouncing liberals and Communists while advocating limited government, free enterprise, separation of church and state, and a strong defense. But because of his unequivocal opinions, Goldwater was vulnerable to attacks that labeled him pro-war and anti-civil rights. Those perceptions, coupled with John F. Kennedy's death a year before the election, undermined Goldwater's presidential hopes, though he remained a strong and influential Senate voice for 23 more years.

Mr. Conservative: Goldwater on Goldwater includes interviews with Senators Edward Kennedy, Hillary Rodham Clinton (a onetime "Goldwater Girl") and John McCain; former TV anchorman Walter Cronkite; humorist Al Franken; reporter Helen Thomas; political consultant James Carville; Goldwater's family; and others.
Okay, so let's look at that list of interviews: Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, Walter Cronkite, Al Franken, Helen Thomas, James Carville...do I see a pattern here? Why are the featured interviews about "Mr. Conservative" all bitterly partisan liberals? McCain gets thrown in there because he succeeded Goldwater and, of course, you have to have interviews with the fam, but everyone else is...ahem, not conservative in the slightest. Curious documentary, this. If I had an ounce of energy to do so, I might be able to turn up some further info on who made this, whether there are interviews with other people besides those mentioned, blah blah blah. I don't so let's just throw our hands up in horror at this utterly biased portrayal of the man.

3.05.2007

Great opening lines...

Among the more entertaining first lines of an essay:

The Spanish Cardinal Merry de Val once said that for the Protestant the Bible is a wax nose to be twisted any way one pleases.
Quoted from this essay, the interest of which I cannot vouch since I am one line into it (warning: I think you need to have JSTOR access).

Curious Word: Eftsoons

What a gem, courtesy of St. Germain.

Eftsoons:

Archaic 1. Soon afterward; presently. 2. Once again.
Gee, thanks, American Heritage Dictionary! Archaic, eh? Not when I'm done with it. I can hear the Microsoft flackies now..."Sales of Zunes will balloon eftsoons."

St. Germaine Part Deux

Chapter XVI of St. Germain's dialogues makes an excellent point about equity:Equity is a right wiseness that considereth all the particular circumstances of the deed, which also is tempered with the sweetness of mercy. And such an equity must always be observed in every law of man, and in every general rule thereof: and that knew he well that said thus, Laws covet to be ruled by equity. And the wise man saith, Be not overmuch wise; for the extreme right wiseness is extreme wrong: as who saith, If thou take all the words of the law giveth thee thou shalt sometime do against the law...it is not possible to make any general rifle of the law, but that it shall fail in some cage...Would that this advice were better heeded, even today! The class from which this reading comes focuses on the development of the rule of law in the Anglo-Saxon tradition, which has meant, thus far, a lot of reading of the likes of Coke, More, St. Germain, Fortescue, the Magna Charta, and, as Puff the Magic Dragon might have said, "other fancy stuff." I'm regularly shocked to realize that basic precepts that are ignored in our 2007 discussion of law were being advocated more than 600 years ago. Nothing new under the sun, though from time to time some things get sunburnt and we think we've found something entirely novel. Or at least I do. Get sunburnt. And find old things that I--...never mind.

Regardless, I'd bet you Gene Healy would have a thing or two to say about equity and the law.

St. Germaine

Ah, you gotta love the phrasology of old writers:

The student starts off by saying that no such thing is in the law of England, but is rather a “general maxim” to guard against the probable possibility “that every man by a nude parole and by a bare averment should avoid an obligation.” I.e., somebody’s word or mere statement of fact is not sufficient to absolve them from an obligation—something of more “authority” is needed.
Okay, that wasn't actually an ancient writer (it was actually RW on St. German), but I tell you it must have been hard to be released on "nude parole." One can only imagine what a strange legal system it was when you could get out of jail so long as someone came to court in the buff to plead for you (bare averment) and you promised not to wear any clothes while outside the walls of the slammer. Let's just hope you didn't get paroled in the cold midwinter, King Wenceslas.

Writing Times

Working on a writing project, though I can't spill the details at the moment. I will say, though, you know you're on the trail of success if you find yourself looking up words like this.

3.02.2007

What a yob...

My heart leapt at this opening. To bad it's far and away, and I can't leave the City of Angels any time soon (not that I want to, but it would be great work here...), but I encourage you to apply:


Managing Editor

The New Atlantis (Ethics and Public Policy Center) | Posted on February 11, 2007

The New Atlantis is seeking a managing editor to participate in every aspect of writing, editing, and managing the journal and its related projects.

Published by the Ethics and Public Policy Center, The New Atlantis (www.TheNewAtlantis.com) is an effort to clarify the nation\'s moral and political understanding of all areas of science and technology. Since its launch in 2003, the journal has been widely praised for essays and articles that probe the deeper meaning of everyday technologies and seek to articulate the human aspirations that drive the scientific enterprise.

A successful candidate will have an intellectual interest in the subjects the journal covers; will be a strong writer, reader, and researcher; and will be energetic and technically competent. Publication experience, management experience, or design experience (e.g., layout, graphic design, or HTML) would be pluses. This position could be a good platform from which a talented young writer, even a recent college graduate, could launch a career.

To apply, please send a cover letter, resume, and writing samples by e-mail to hiring@thenewatlantis.com or by fax to 202-408-0632. For more information, contact Adam Keiper at 202-682-1200 or akeiper@thenewatlantis.com.

2.28.2007

Wikipeida & Plum

Demonstrating once again that she is a fickle mate, ever wont to change her ways, Wikipedia has gone and pulled the rug from under my feet. I stole into her depths (hrm, that doesn't sound right), probing (still not right) a fact about a P.G. Wodehouse that I had once found there. The fact in question had disappeared, but a number of other troubling facts had since emerged, not least among them, Wodehouse's German internment.

Although Wodehouse and his novels are considered quintessentially English, from 1924 on he lived largely in France and the United States. He was also profoundly uninterested in politics and world affairs. When World War II broke out in 1939 he remained at his seaside home in Le Touquet, France, instead of returning to England, apparently failing to recognize the seriousness of the conflict. He was subsequently taken prisoner by the Germans in 1940 and interned by them for a year, first in Belgium, then at Tost in Upper Silesia (now in Poland). (He is recorded as saying "If this is Upper Silesia, one must wonder what Lower Silesia must be like...".)

While at Tost, he entertained his fellow prisoners with witty dialogues, which, after being released from internment a few months short of his 60th birthday, he used as the basis for a series of radio broadcasts aimed at America (but not England) he was persuaded by the Germans to make from Berlin. Wartime England was in no mood for light-hearted banter, however, and the broadcasts led to many accusations of collaboration with the Nazis and even treason. Some libraries banned his books. Foremost among his critics was A. A. Milne, author of the "Winnie the Pooh" books; Wodehouse got some revenge by creating a ridiculous character named "Timothy Bobbin," who starred in parodies of some of Milne's children's poetry. Among Wodehouse's defenders were Evelyn Waugh and George Orwell.

It's too late for me to defend P.G., so I'll save that for a later date. For now, check out Orwell's defense. G'nite.

Death on High


Falling into the category "I-have-no-category-for-this-oddness," it appears that "six feet under" may soon be a quite inappropriate description of some final resting places.

Though it looks like something out of Perdido Street Station, it's really a skyscraping extension to the Memorial Necrópole Ecumênica, "a vertical cemetery established in Santos in Brazil in 1983."

This futuristic, insectile extension "will create another 25,000 niches, set inside a 108-metre-high tower block that will complete the complex."

It will be circled by birds, looming alien on the horizon.
Further reading on this truly odd tower reveals that "vertical cemeteries" already exist around the globe. To continue this adventure, continue reading and see other cooler pictures at BLDGBLOG.

2.27.2007

Primo, Writer

I overlooked this interesting bit of news earlier this month. I guess it got lost in the avalanche that is the web. The New Yorker recently published some short stories by Primo Levi, translated from Italian for the first time. Part of a broader effort to expose readers to the writer's work outside his Holocaust literature, among the interesting pieces is "A Tranquil Star." It caught my eye by being described as Kafka-esque. I couldn't resist seeing if the animus I share for the inestimable Kafka would extend to Levi's newly translated stories. The verdict? Well, here's a passage.

Once upon a time, somewhere in the universe very far from here, lived a peaceful star, which moved peacefully in the immensity of the sky, surrounded by a crowd of peaceful planets about which we have not a thing to report. This star was very big and very hot, and its weight was enormous: and here a reporter’s difficulties begin. We have written “very far,” “big,” “hot,” “enormous”: Australia is very far, an elephant is big and a house is bigger, this morning I had a hot bath, Everest is enormous. It’s clear that something in our lexicon isn’t working.
But it's not clear that something in the story isn't working. I just haven't yet decided how I feel about the story. So, I guess you'll have to read it as well. So there.

Sweet Meru, Sign Me Up

Give it a minute...every childhood dream will come true as this guy blows your mind.

Larger Than Life: Sir William Napier

For a class, I've been reading some selections of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Right at the beginning of "The Soldier's Faith" (remarks delivered on Memorial Day, May 30, 1895 at "a Meeting Called by the Graduating Class of Harvard University"), he makes the point that of all characteristics, wealth is most greatly admired in a man.

I once heard a man say, "Where Vanderbilt sits, there is the head of the table. I teach my son to be rich." He sad what many think. For although the generation born about 1840, and now governing the world, has fought two at least of the greatest wars in history...war is out of fashion, and the man who commands the attention of his fellows is the man of wealth.

...

Most of my hearers would rather that their daughters or their sisters should marry a son of one of the great rich families than a regular army officer, were he as beautiful, brace, and gifted as Sir William Napier.
This name brought me to a halt. It sounded familiar, but beyond that it was foreign.

As it turns out, Sir William Napier is a fascinating character. My immediate resource, not surprisingly, was that omniwebpresent anthology of knowledge, Wikipedia, but I'm intrigued and will be pursuing a further investigation as time permits. Napier had, depending on how you look at it, a charmed or cursed life.
Sir William Francis Patrick Napier (December 7, 1785 - February 12, 1860), British soldier and military historian, third son of Colonel George Napier (1751-1804) was born at Celbridge, near Dublin.

He became an ensign in the Royal Irish Artillery in 1800, but at once exchanged into the 62nd, and was put on half-pay in 1802. He was afterwards made a cornet in the Blues by the influence of his uncle the duke of Richmond, and for the first time did actual military duty in this regiment, but he soon fell in with Sir John Moore's suggestion that he should exchange into the 52nd, which was about to be trained in the famous camp of Shorncliffe. Through Sir John Moore he soon obtained a company in the 43rd, joined that regiment at Shorncliffe and became a great favourite with Moore.

He served in Denmark, and was present at the engagement of Kioge, and, his regiment being shortly afterwards sent to Spain, he bore himself nobly through the retreat to Corunna, the hardships of which permanently impaired his health. In 1809 he became aide-de-camp to the duke of Richmond, lord lieutenant of Ireland, but joined the 43rd when that regiment was ordered again to Spain. With the light brigade (the 43rd, 52nd, and 95th), under the command of General Craufurd, he marched to Talavera in the famous forced march which he has described in his History, and had a violent attack of pleurisy on the way.

He, however, refused to leave Spain, was wounded on the Coa, and shot near the spine at Cazal Nova. His conduct was so conspicuous during the pursuit of Masséna after he left the lines of Torres Vedras that he as well as his brother George was recommended for a brevet majority. He became brigade major, was present at Fuentes d'Onor, but had so bad an attack of ague that he was obliged to return to England. In England he married Caroline Amelia Fox, daughter of General Henry Fox and niece of the statesman Fox.


If you're beginning to notice a pattern, I congratulate you. Napier seemed to be a magnet for non-mortal wounds and crippling, but not lethal, diseases.

His resilience, of course, is not why Holmes employed as the paragon of martial spirit. Over his long active military career, he seemed to have a near-fanatical devotion to his troops (perhaps the reason he suffered so often and so grievously in battle). Further, though he was a fighting man, and largely illiterate at the time of his retirement from active service, he schooled himself in literature and became a highly popular and well-regarded historian. His major work recounted that campaign that he played a significant role in, The History of the Peninsula War, and, with the publication of each successive volume, was quite a hit (though sales weren't so torrid right out the gate).

Napier's life merits much further examination, and I regret that I may never have the time to do his life justice. I'll close by noting he came from one helluva a fighting family. Consider his brothers:
Not a bad record at all. Righto, back to work, back to work.